gerundt wrote:Cool news!
gerundt wrote:If I remember correctly, we backported only the non-critical Trunk updates to R2_14. So it should be quite stable.
gerundt wrote:Have you also plans for the time after the new stable version? Im not sure if we really have the man power for a "WinMerge 3" from scratch. I like the idea from Jochen's WinMerge 2011 to drop the ATL/MFC dependencies. Maybe we can drop some features like Visual SourceSafe and Rational ClearCase integration, backports some parts from WinMerge 2011 to make the Trunk fit for feature releases?
christianlist wrote:I agree that WinMerge 3 seems to be going very slow at the moment, so it could make good sense to keep 2.x alive for a while.
christianlist wrote:Removing the ATL/MFC dependencies are one of the good ideas we could use from WinMerge 2011.
Making the code accessible to more developers would be very beneficial to the future of this project.
Maybe Jochen can tell us more about what he did to make it work?
christianlist wrote:What I would like in 2.16 is 64 bit support.
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 1 guest