by eburkitt » Fri Nov 02, 2012 8:25 pm
That's certainly reasonable. The question originally came from my desire to have access to the Boost Smart Ptr library, but I later noticed that Qt has at least one smart pointer itself. I've not worked with Qt before, so I will definitely be spending some time with its documentation to get a sense of what's available.
If I need capability beyond what the standard library and Qt can provide, choosing a library with: an OSS-compatible license, cross-platform availability and a header-only (or at least statically linkable) implementation, in roughly that order of importance, should keep me from doing too much damage.
-evan